Company analysis

Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) forecast and analysis

Health Care · Health Care Equipment & Supplies · Reading of March 2, 2026

Last close
$75.45
Fair value (DCF)
$60.44

Gap to fair value −19.9%

21-session view
−1.78%

band −6.6% to +3.1%

63-session view
−2.42%
Market regime
strong risk-off

The reading in brief

Hologic, Inc. (HOLX), a Health Care company in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, shows a reading dated March 2, 2026 in which the model's fair value of $60.44 sits well below the latest close of $75.45, a gap of −19.9%. The published 21-session view leans down, with an expected return of −1.78% and a probability of a rise of 27%, a fairly firm tilt, though the band from −6.6% to +3.1% spans both signs. The 63-session view, at −2.42%, points the same way. The market regime reads as strong risk-off. The record on this name is comparatively long, with 76% of 104 matured 21-session forecasts matching the direction.

Written automatically from the figures on this page; every figure is filled in from the day's data.

Research cockpit

Each source's reading of HOLX today, the stance it takes against the published view, and what would change it. The same board subscribers open in the console.

supports
−19.9%value gap · DCF against pricefair value $60 vs $75.45 · the DCF's own chance it is undervalued: 43%supports at −10% or less · against at +10% or more
against
+28unified technical score3-session run vs industry −0.04%, higher than 49% of sector; such falls have tended to partly reversesupports at −15 or less · against at +15 or more
mixed
6 / 9Piotroski F-scoreROIC 2.4% · D/E 0.48 · Q4 period to Dec 27, 2025supports at 3 or less · against at 7 or more
supports
15%recommended exposuremarket-wide strong risk off · the regime's tilt for Health Care −0.91 · as of Oct 8, 2026supports at 40% or less · against at 75% or more
no reading
Not in readingcovering in the last 180 days · our own estimate recordNo analyst-coverage reading for HOLX.supports in the most-covered 40% of its sector · against in the least-covered 40% — the most-covered fifth beat the median stock 49 times in 100 over three months, the least-covered 52 (since 2012) · no reading, no side

Model reading

what the published belief says · what only a portfolio can add
leans down−1.78%2 of 4 sources with a reading for · 1 without a reading · 21d belief · 11 voices · gated: incoherent
Price impactmeasured · this symbol
higher than 48% of sector (Kyle λ)Names with higher price impact have done slightly worse over the next week (the ordering held in 27 of 32 years). Order size itself is a portfolio decision.
Liquidity vs edgemeasured · this symbol
more liquid than 2% of sector (Amihud)Less liquid names have earned more over three months (the ordering held in 25 of 32 years). The portfolio prices the order.
Band legs · q10 / q9021 sessions
−6.6% / +3.1%
Risk checksper portfolio
Run in the portfolio, not on a symbol — 13 checks (position ceiling, gross exposure, sector concentration …)
Regime overridemarket-wide · Oct 8, 2026
scaled15% exposure
Reliability21 sessions
0.000 = the 21-session head has not yet earned a reliability score on settled outcomes.
Price impact in fifths · the next week50%56%44%50lowest50low50middle▲ now50high49highest
Illiquidity in fifths · the next three months50%56%44%48lowest49low50middle51high52highest▲ now
Bars: out of 100 stocks in each fifth of all stocks, how many beat the median stock. The dashed line is 50, a coin flip; the axis is zoomed to 44–56. ▲ = where HOLX sits today.
InsightProven signal
What it meansHOLX's price impact over 5 sessions is higher than 48% of sector; by illiquidity it is more liquid than 2% of sector. Both are measured on HOLX itself, not a portfolio.
What history saysOut of 100 stocks with the highest price impact, 49 beat the median stock over the next week; with the lowest, 50. HOLX sits in the middle fifth today. That ordering held in 27 of 32 years since 1995. On average the lowest fifth out-earned the highest by 0.13 points over the next week. Over the next three months 52 in 100 of the least liquid fifth beat the median stock, against 48 of the most liquid. HOLX sits in the highest fifth for illiquidity.
How to use itThese describe what an order in HOLX would face, not which way it goes. Order size stays a portfolio decision.
For the curious: Kyle λ at 5 sessions: rank IC −0.011 · t −6.3 · 27/32 years · 1,633 weekly samples since 1995 · Amihud at 63 sessions: rank IC +0.044 · t +3.9 · 25/32 years · 1,621 weekly samples since 1995

Published belief band

q10 — μ — q90 per horizon · conformal · rank among names

Square = expected return, bar = the model's q10–q90 range, right = where the expected return ranks among 1,353 names. A hollow square has no published range — do not size on it.

Exit map

Where HOLX's 21-session band legs sit against today's close is in the console, with the valuation, technical, fundamentals and regime tabs.

Why it leans down, not up

posterior against a 51.7% base rate
P(up)0.27below a coin flip
E[r]−1.78%expected, 21 sessions
σ2.94%spread of outcomes
Rankp6of 1,353 names
E[r] / σ−0.61reward per unit of spread
Evidence balance · the belief's own arithmeticfor +0.53% · against −0.85% · net −0.32%Each voice's expected return times its weight; the rows sum exactly to the belief.
Outside evidence · measured, not voting
lowest in sectorhighest
Run vs industry · 3 sessionshigher than 49% of sectorsits in the middle
Beat its factors · 21 sessionshigher than 38% of sectorleans against it
Unusual volume · vs its yearhigher than 52% of sectorsits in the middle
Price impact (Kyle λ)higher than 48% of sectorsits in the middle
Illiquidity (Amihud)higher than 98% of sectorleans against it
Short-sale volume · 21 sessionshigher than 7% of sectorleans against it
Tinted half = the side of the sector that has gone on to do better on that measure, in the evidence study since 1995, 2009. These do not enter the belief's arithmetic — they tell you whether the market's own record agrees with it.
Context · measured, no signal
lowest in sectorhighest
Insider transactions · 90 dayssales 0 · purchases 0higher than 13% of sector · higher than 34% of its past year. Last insider purchase 299 days ago.No signal · contextWho is selling, not which way the stock goes: 0 of 88 insider feature-horizons have shown a proven edge.
Blockholder concentration0.41 HHI3 blockholders hold 23.1%. Their concentration is higher than 87% of sector and higher than 98% of its past year.No signal · contextWho controls the float, over 90 days: no 13D filing; passive 13G filings: 1. 0 of 32 ownership feature-horizons have shown a proven edge.
Days to cover1.8 dayshigher than 17% of sector · higher than 45% of its past year.No signal · contextHow many days of volume the shorts would need to close; it lags (reported twice a month), and 0 of 4 of its horizons have shown a proven edge.
10-year yield beta−0.074 · t -3.75higher than 14% of sector · higher than 3% of its past year.No signal · context0 of 96 macro-sensitivity feature-horizons have shown a proven edge.
Hollow square = where HOLX sits in its sector; no side is tinted because neither side has done better on these measures.
Conditional hit rate · how the prior updatesPlatform-wide, not HOLX's own record. The tick is the base rate; a top-decile belief has not beaten it.
InsightModel output
What it meansThe belief leans down (−1.78%) and its own P(up) is 0.27: a negative average and a worse-than-even chance of rising.
What history saysThe expected return ranks higher than 6% of 1,353 names today. On settled outcomes a top-decile belief has been right 51.0% of the time against 51.7% for every name. Proven measures read outside the belief: 6 — favouring it, 0; leaning against it, 3. The strongest of them, Run vs industry · 3 sessions, held its ordering in 32 of 32 years since 1995.
How to use itRead the rank and the range before the number; the band legs, not the average, say how wide the outcomes run.
For the curious: direction_prob, mu, sigma from ii_belief · rank among 1,353 names · base rate from the signal-validation study, platform-wide, Sep 2, 2025 to Sep 9, 2026

What would change this reading

current reading measured · the trigger's source named
The fair-value gap rises above −10%−19.9% todaythe valuation rule on this tab
The 3-session run climbs back to the sector middlehigher than 49% of sector todayproven reversal · the next week
Short-sale volume rises into the top half of the sectorhigher than 7% of sector · higher than 51% of its past yearproven · one to three months
Voice agreement drops11 voices · 63% consistentportfolio policy sets the level
The market regime turns more risk-offstrong risk off todayregime tab · market-wide

Voice agreement · 21d

5 scored voices · belief as of Mar 2, 2026
bundle71%right on direction · n 125latest +0.2%
catboost82%right on direction · n 125latest −0.9%
lstm85%right on direction · n 125latest −0.7%
mimo79%right on direction · n 125latest −1.4%
quantile44%right on direction · n 125latest −1.3%

How often each model called HOLX's 21-session direction right on settled outcomes. Below 60 settled calls the figure is greyed: too few to judge.

Valuation & Predictions, Technical Structure, Fundamentals & Filings and Regime are in the console.

Forecast record on HOLX

76% of 104 matured 21-session forecasts on Hologic, Inc. called the direction correctly.

−2.4%0%+2.4%−10.3%0%+10.3%Published 21-session view
What happened ↑

Each square is one matured forecast: the view published that day against the return that followed.

Questions about HOLX

What is the fair value of Hologic, Inc. stock?
The model's discounted-cash-flow fair value for HOLX is $60.44 per share against a $75.45 close on March 2, 2026, a gap of −19.9%. It is an estimate with a range, not a price target.
What is the HOLX stock forecast?
The published 21-session view for HOLX is −1.78%, with a band from −6.6% to +3.1%; over 63 sessions it is −2.42%. These are probabilities from the platform's machine-learning models, re-estimated every trading day.
How accurate have the forecasts for HOLX been?
76% of 104 matured 21-session forecasts on Hologic, Inc. called the direction correctly. Every forecast is published before its outcome is known and scored when it matures.
Is this investment advice?
No. It is a dated model reading of one company, published for research. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

A dated model reading, not investment advice. Forecasts are probabilities and can be wrong.

How the fair value is estimatedHow every forecast is testedDisclosures