Do stocks with an ADX above 25 go on to beat the rest?
Not in the data. Since 1995, US stocks whose 14-day ADX sat above 25, the textbook mark of a strong trend, beat the same day's median stock over the next month 50 times in 100; a coin flip gives 50. Stocks below 20, with no trend, did the same: 50 in 100. The rank correlation between ADX and the next month's return was 0.000: no measurable edge.
The paper
The full study: its data, method, robustness, limits and sources.
Opulence Alpha Research · Published Sep 25, 2026 · Data through Aug 21, 2026
Keywords: ADX indicator, ADX above 25, does ADX work, average directional index, ADX trend strength, ADX strategy backtest·JEL classification: G11, G12, G14, C12, C58
- Universe
- The same for every study: 1,767 US common stocks in the 11 GICS sectors, 422 of them since delisted; S&P 500 members since 1996 plus large and mid-sized companies outside the index
- Period
- Every Wednesday from Jan 4, 1995 to Aug 19, 2026: 1,634 Wednesdays across 7,959 trading sessions
- Sample
- n = 1,763 stocks of the 1,767-stock universe; 1,889,758 stock-weeks, a median of 1,148 stocks per Wednesday
- Outcome
- Return over the next 1, 5, 21 and 63 trading sessions against the same day's median stock
- Inference
- t on non-overlapping dates; proven only when |t| ≥ 3 and the same sign in at least 60% of years
1Introduction
J. Welles Wilder's average directional index, ADX, measures how strongly a price has been trending over the last 14 days, on a scale from 0 to 100, without saying in which direction. Trading manuals read a value above 25 as a strong trend and a value below 20 as no trend at all, and many trend rules act only when ADX is high. This study asks whether stocks in a strong trend by that reading go on to beat other stocks, and whether stocks with no trend go on to trail them.
2Data and method
2.1Sample design
Population and frame. The population is US common stocks listed on the NYSE and Nasdaq; funds, ETFs, trusts, preferred shares, warrants and units are excluded. The sampling frame is a fixed universe of 1,767 companies, drawn once when the platform was built and not re-sampled since, in two strata. Stratum 1 is a census of the S&P 500: every company in the index at any time since 1996 whose price history could be recovered, 1,027 companies of which 413 have since delisted; it holds 76% of the index's members in 1996 and at least 96% in every year from 2010. Stratum 2 is 740 large and mid-sized companies outside the index, selected in proportion to the market's sector weights from the stocks that passed a minimum share price of $15 and a minimum average daily trading value of $25 million; 9 of them have since delisted.
Sample. The unit of observation is a stock-week: one stock on one Wednesday. A stock enters a Wednesday's cross-section when it has a valid close that day, a value of the signal and a measured outcome; bars flagged as bad data and returns that cross a change of issuer are left out. This study's sample is n = 1,763 stocks of the 1,767: 1,889,758 stock-weeks on 1,634 Wednesdays from Jan 4, 1995 to Aug 19, 2026, a median of 1,148 stocks per Wednesday (range 820 to 1,371). 331,954 stock-weeks (17.6%) come from the 422 companies that have since delisted. Every stock and every Wednesday carries equal weight.
Representativeness. Table 1 gives the sample by GICS sector beside the S&P Composite 1500: 7.9% of companies would have to change sector for the two to match exactly. By latest market value, 55% of the active companies are large (at least $10bn), 38% mid ($2–10bn) and 6% small. Because Stratum 2 was chosen from companies listed at construction, its history carries survivorship bias. Section 4 repeats the lead result among the stocks that were S&P 500 members on each date, the part of the sample largely free of that bias.
Companies in this study's sample, of them those since delisted, the size of the active companies, the sample's share of stock-weeks and the sector's share of the S&P Composite 1500.
| Sector | Sample | Delisted | Large | Mid | Small | Stock-weeks | S&P 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 282 | 67 | 122 | 76 | 18 | 13.9% | 12.7% |
| Financials | 256 | 60 | 114 | 74 | 8 | 14.6% | 17.2% |
| Industrials | 255 | 53 | 126 | 67 | 11 | 15.9% | 17.5% |
| Health Care | 237 | 47 | 92 | 81 | 16 | 12.4% | 10.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 209 | 39 | 69 | 87 | 12 | 12.3% | 12.9% |
| Energy | 105 | 30 | 39 | 31 | 5 | 5.9% | 4.7% |
| Consumer Staples | 101 | 38 | 40 | 17 | 5 | 5.9% | 4.9% |
| Materials | 94 | 34 | 35 | 24 | 2 | 5.6% | 5.1% |
| Real Estate | 84 | 10 | 40 | 32 | 2 | 5.7% | 6.9% |
| Communication Services | 80 | 31 | 28 | 13 | 5 | 3.9% | 3.3% |
| Utilities | 60 | 13 | 35 | 12 | 0 | 4% | 4% |
| All sectors | 1,763 | 422 | 740 | 514 | 84 | 100% | 100% |
Sample: n = 1,763 of the 1,767 companies. Size by latest market value for the 1,338 active companies with one: large ≥ $10bn, mid $2–10bn, small < $2bn. S&P 1500 shares count the constituents of the S&P 500, MidCap 400 and SmallCap 600 (1,506 companies, lists read Sep 25, 2026). Sectors are each company's current GICS sector.
2.2Signals
| Signal | Definition | Since | Wednesdays |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADX above 25 | Wilder's 14-day ADX above 25, the textbook strong trend, on any observed day | Jan 4, 1995 | 1,633 |
| ADX below 20 | Wilder's 14-day ADX below 20, the textbook absence of a trend, on any observed day | Jan 4, 1995 | 1,633 |
| ADX (14-day) | Wilder's average directional index over 14 days, 0 to 100; ranked across stocks each Wednesday | Jan 4, 1995 | 1,634 |
2.3Measurement
Outcome. The return from the close on the Wednesday to the close 1, 5, 21 and 63 trading sessions later, on closes adjusted for splits and dividends, compared with the same day's median stock; half of all stocks beat the median by construction, so chance is 50 in 100 on every date. No delisting return is added.
Each Wednesday, the stocks showing the reading are scored against the same day's median stock. A state counts on every Wednesday it holds; a cross or breakout counts only on the Wednesday it happens.
Each Wednesday the stocks are ranked on the signal. The study reports how often each fifth of that ranking beat the median stock, and the rank correlation (IC) between the signal and the return that followed.
The t-statistic uses non-overlapping dates only. A result is called proven when |t| is at least 3, it held in at least 60% of years and it is large enough to matter; with 1,470 tests across the studies, a looser bar would pass dozens by luck.
Full data and methods3Results
Figure 1 reads every horizon for both readings. Stocks with ADX above 25 beat the median stock 49 times in 100 over the next session, 50 over the next week, 50 over the next month and 50 over the next three months; stocks with ADX below 20 beat it 50, 50, 50 and 50 times. Only the next session shows anything: a faint lag in both groups (t -6.0 and -3.1), too small to count as an edge and not reliable on its own; from a week out, both are indistinguishable from a coin flip. Out of every 100 stocks in a strong trend, 50 beat the median stock over the following month; out of every 100 with no trend, 50 did (Figure 2).
Share of stocks showing the reading that beat the same day's median stock, by horizon. The line at 50 is chance, the grey band the range chance alone produces; a filled square is a proven relation.
Rank correlation between the signal and the return that followed, with its 95% interval. An interval that crosses zero is no relation.
Each square is one calendar year; filled = a year in which the average stock showing the signal lagged the median stock over the next month. Years are counted, not shown in order.
A signal with an edge would fill most squares, or leave most empty.
Rank correlation inside each GICS sector over the next month, stocks ranked only against their own sector. Colour only where |t| ≥ 2.
Figure 3 treats ADX as a scale rather than a threshold. The rank correlation between a stock's ADX and its return over the next month was 0.000 (t -0.2), and it held no steady direction: its yearly average pointed one way in 16 of 32 years and the other way in the rest. At no horizon does it clear the bar for a measurable edge.
ADX measures how strongly a stock has been moving, not which way. A high reading covers stocks that have risen hard and stocks that have fallen hard alike, so on its own it says nothing about which stocks lead next. This study tests that reading on its own; the direction of a trend is a separate question.
4Robustness
Table 3 reads both readings horizon by horizon: over the next month, stocks with ADX above 25 sat below 50 in 18 of 32 years and above it in the rest, and stocks with ADX below 20 sat below it in 17 of 32. Table 4 finds the rank correlation near zero overall (0.000, t -0.2), in each decade and among S&P 500 members on the date (-0.008, t -0.6).
Share that beat the median stock, its t-statistic on non-overlapping dates, and the years in which it pointed the same way.
| Horizon | Beat the median | t | Years, same way |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADX above 25, session | 49.4 | -6.0 | 25 / 32 |
| ADX above 25, week | 49.9 | -1.7 | 18 / 32 |
| ADX above 25, month | 50.0 | -0.3 | 18 / 32 |
| ADX above 25, three months | 50.1 | 0.2 | 15 / 32 |
| ADX below 20, session | 49.9 | -3.1 | 15 / 32 |
| ADX below 20, week | 49.9 | -1.7 | 19 / 32 |
| ADX below 20, month | 49.9 | -0.5 | 17 / 32 |
| ADX below 20, three months | 49.9 | -0.5 | 17 / 32 |
Rank IC and its t-statistic on non-overlapping dates.
| Sample | IC | t | Wednesdays |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADX (14-day), next month | |||
| All stocks, whole period | 0.0002 | -0.2 | 1,630 |
| By decade: 1995–2004 | 0.0028 | 0.9 | 516 |
| By decade: 2005–2014 | -0.0029 | -0.7 | 518 |
| By decade: 2015– | 0.0007 | -0.2 | 596 |
| S&P 500 members on the date | -0.0077 | -0.6 | 1,578 |
| Sectors with the overall sign | 9 / 11 |
5Limitations
- ADX measures the strength of a trend, not its direction. This study tests the strength reading on its own and does not split rising trends from falling ones (Wilder's +DI and −DI lines); a rule that pairs ADX with a direction is a different test.
- Before costs. Averages exclude trading costs, taxes and market impact.
- Same-close timing. Returns start at the close the signal is computed from; a real trade would start later.
- Survivors among smaller companies. The non-index names were chosen from companies listed when the universe was built; no delisting returns are added.
6Conclusion
ADX tells how hard a stock has been moving, and on this evidence that is all it tells. Stocks in a strong trend by the textbook threshold did not go on to beat other stocks, stocks with no trend did not go on to trail them, and ranked as a scale, ADX carried no measurable relation to the following month's return. Whatever the indicator adds when paired with a direction, the strength reading alone does not separate the stocks that lead from those that lag.
References
- Wilder, J. W. (1978). New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems. Trend Research.
- Park, C.-H. and Irwin, S. H. (2007). What Do We Know About the Profitability of Technical Analysis? Journal of Economic Surveys 21(4).
- Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57(1).
- Grinold, R. C. and Kahn, R. N. (2000). Active Portfolio Management, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill.
- Harvey, C. R., Liu, Y. and Zhu, H. (2016). … and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns. Review of Financial Studies 29(1).
- Shumway, T. (1997). The Delisting Bias in CRSP Data. Journal of Finance 52(1).
Appendix A. Questions readers ask
- Does an ADX above 25 predict better returns?
- Not across US stocks. Since 1995, stocks with a 14-day ADX above 25 beat the same day's median stock over the next month 50 times in 100 and over three months 50 times, against 50 for a coin flip. There is no measurable edge.
- Is a low ADX a warning sign?
- Not in the data. Stocks with ADX below 20, the textbook mark of no trend, beat the median stock over the next month 50 times in 100: indistinguishable from a coin flip, and from stocks in a strong trend.
- Why doesn't ADX predict returns?
- ADX measures how strongly a stock has been moving, not which way. A high reading covers stocks that have risen hard and stocks that have fallen hard alike, so on its own it says nothing about which stocks lead next. This study tests that reading on its own; the direction of a trend is a separate question.
- How was ADX measured?
- Every Wednesday from Jan 4, 1995 to Aug 19, 2026, the stocks whose 14-day ADX (Wilder's average directional index) sat above 25, or below 20, were compared with the same day's median stock over the next 1, 5, 21 and 63 trading sessions, on the same universe of 1,767 US stocks every study uses.
Data availability and citation
Every figure in this paper is quoted from one frozen snapshot, published as JSON with the sample description, the robustness results and the test counts. The same snapshot feeds the research console, so the two cannot disagree.
Opulence Alpha Research (2026). Do stocks with an ADX above 25 go on to beat the rest? Opulence Alpha Studies, Sep 25, 2026. https://opulencealpha.ai/studies/adx-strong-trend
Research, not advice. A measured tendency across hundreds of stocks is a nudge for any one of them, never a forecast of its price.