Belief tested · Technical indicators

Do stocks with an ADX above 25 go on to beat the rest?

The belief“An ADX above 25 marks a strong trend that is likely to continue.”
VerdictNo edge
50 in 100stocks beat the median stock over the next month after the signal. A coin flip gives 50.

Not in the data. Since 1995, US stocks whose 14-day ADX sat above 25, the textbook mark of a strong trend, beat the same day's median stock over the next month 50 times in 100; a coin flip gives 50. Stocks below 20, with no trend, did the same: 50 in 100. The rank correlation between ADX and the next month's return was 0.000: no measurable edge.

At a glance
4648505254
Of 100
ADX above 25, next session · faint
49.4
ADX above 25, next week
49.9
ADX above 25, next month
50.0
ADX above 25, next three months
50.1
range a coin flip produces50 = chanceno measurable edgeproven relation
Samplen = 1,763of the 1,767-stock universe
Signals counted686,545on Wednesdays since 1995
Years below 5018 / 32next month
Rank correlation0.000t -0.2, next month
Period1995–20261,634 Wednesdays

The paper

The full study: its data, method, robustness, limits and sources.

Opulence Alpha Research · Published Sep 25, 2026 · Data through Aug 21, 2026

Keywords: ADX indicator, ADX above 25, does ADX work, average directional index, ADX trend strength, ADX strategy backtest·JEL classification: G11, G12, G14, C12, C58

Study design
Universe
The same for every study: 1,767 US common stocks in the 11 GICS sectors, 422 of them since delisted; S&P 500 members since 1996 plus large and mid-sized companies outside the index
Period
Every Wednesday from Jan 4, 1995 to Aug 19, 2026: 1,634 Wednesdays across 7,959 trading sessions
Sample
n = 1,763 stocks of the 1,767-stock universe; 1,889,758 stock-weeks, a median of 1,148 stocks per Wednesday
Outcome
Return over the next 1, 5, 21 and 63 trading sessions against the same day's median stock
Inference
t on non-overlapping dates; proven only when |t| ≥ 3 and the same sign in at least 60% of years

1Introduction

J. Welles Wilder's average directional index, ADX, measures how strongly a price has been trending over the last 14 days, on a scale from 0 to 100, without saying in which direction. Trading manuals read a value above 25 as a strong trend and a value below 20 as no trend at all, and many trend rules act only when ADX is high. This study asks whether stocks in a strong trend by that reading go on to beat other stocks, and whether stocks with no trend go on to trail them.

2Data and method

2.1Sample design

Population and frame. The population is US common stocks listed on the NYSE and Nasdaq; funds, ETFs, trusts, preferred shares, warrants and units are excluded. The sampling frame is a fixed universe of 1,767 companies, drawn once when the platform was built and not re-sampled since, in two strata. Stratum 1 is a census of the S&P 500: every company in the index at any time since 1996 whose price history could be recovered, 1,027 companies of which 413 have since delisted; it holds 76% of the index's members in 1996 and at least 96% in every year from 2010. Stratum 2 is 740 large and mid-sized companies outside the index, selected in proportion to the market's sector weights from the stocks that passed a minimum share price of $15 and a minimum average daily trading value of $25 million; 9 of them have since delisted.

Sample. The unit of observation is a stock-week: one stock on one Wednesday. A stock enters a Wednesday's cross-section when it has a valid close that day, a value of the signal and a measured outcome; bars flagged as bad data and returns that cross a change of issuer are left out. This study's sample is n = 1,763 stocks of the 1,767: 1,889,758 stock-weeks on 1,634 Wednesdays from Jan 4, 1995 to Aug 19, 2026, a median of 1,148 stocks per Wednesday (range 820 to 1,371). 331,954 stock-weeks (17.6%) come from the 422 companies that have since delisted. Every stock and every Wednesday carries equal weight.

Representativeness. Table 1 gives the sample by GICS sector beside the S&P Composite 1500: 7.9% of companies would have to change sector for the two to match exactly. By latest market value, 55% of the active companies are large (at least $10bn), 38% mid ($2–10bn) and 6% small. Because Stratum 2 was chosen from companies listed at construction, its history carries survivorship bias. Section 4 repeats the lead result among the stocks that were S&P 500 members on each date, the part of the sample largely free of that bias.

Table 1. The sample by sector

Companies in this study's sample, of them those since delisted, the size of the active companies, the sample's share of stock-weeks and the sector's share of the S&P Composite 1500.

SectorSampleDelistedLargeMidSmallStock-weeksS&P 1500
Information Technology28267122761813.9%12.7%
Financials2566011474814.6%17.2%
Industrials25553126671115.9%17.5%
Health Care2374792811612.4%10.9%
Consumer Discretionary2093969871212.3%12.9%
Energy10530393155.9%4.7%
Consumer Staples10138401755.9%4.9%
Materials9434352425.6%5.1%
Real Estate8410403225.7%6.9%
Communication Services8031281353.9%3.3%
Utilities6013351204%4%
All sectors1,76342274051484100%100%

Sample: n = 1,763 of the 1,767 companies. Size by latest market value for the 1,338 active companies with one: large ≥ $10bn, mid $2–10bn, small < $2bn. S&P 1500 shares count the constituents of the S&P 500, MidCap 400 and SmallCap 600 (1,506 companies, lists read Sep 25, 2026). Sectors are each company's current GICS sector.

2.2Signals

Table 2. Signals studied
SignalDefinitionSinceWednesdays
ADX above 25Wilder's 14-day ADX above 25, the textbook strong trend, on any observed dayJan 4, 19951,633
ADX below 20Wilder's 14-day ADX below 20, the textbook absence of a trend, on any observed dayJan 4, 19951,633
ADX (14-day)Wilder's average directional index over 14 days, 0 to 100; ranked across stocks each WednesdayJan 4, 19951,634

2.3Measurement

Outcome. The return from the close on the Wednesday to the close 1, 5, 21 and 63 trading sessions later, on closes adjusted for splits and dividends, compared with the same day's median stock; half of all stocks beat the median by construction, so chance is 50 in 100 on every date. No delisting return is added.

Each Wednesday, the stocks showing the reading are scored against the same day's median stock. A state counts on every Wednesday it holds; a cross or breakout counts only on the Wednesday it happens.

Each Wednesday the stocks are ranked on the signal. The study reports how often each fifth of that ranking beat the median stock, and the rank correlation (IC) between the signal and the return that followed.

The t-statistic uses non-overlapping dates only. A result is called proven when |t| is at least 3, it held in at least 60% of years and it is large enough to matter; with 1,470 tests across the studies, a looser bar would pass dozens by luck.

Full data and methods

3Results

Figure 1 reads every horizon for both readings. Stocks with ADX above 25 beat the median stock 49 times in 100 over the next session, 50 over the next week, 50 over the next month and 50 over the next three months; stocks with ADX below 20 beat it 50, 50, 50 and 50 times. Only the next session shows anything: a faint lag in both groups (t -6.0 and -3.1), too small to count as an edge and not reliable on its own; from a week out, both are indistinguishable from a coin flip. Out of every 100 stocks in a strong trend, 50 beat the median stock over the following month; out of every 100 with no trend, 50 did (Figure 2).

Figure 1. How often it beat the median stock

Share of stocks showing the reading that beat the same day's median stock, by horizon. The line at 50 is chance, the grey band the range chance alone produces; a filled square is a proven relation.

4648505254
Of 100
ADX above 25
ADX above 25, next session · faint
49.4
ADX above 25, next week
49.9
ADX above 25, next month
50.0
ADX above 25, next three months
50.1
ADX below 20
ADX below 20, next session · faint
49.9
ADX below 20, next week
49.9
ADX below 20, next month
49.9
ADX below 20, next three months
49.9
range a coin flip produces50 = chanceno measurable edgeproven relation
Figure 2. Out of every 100 stocks
ADX above 25: 50 of 100 beat the median stock over the next month
ADX below 20: 50 of 100 beat the median stock over the next month
Figure 3. How strong, and for how long

Rank correlation between the signal and the return that followed, with its 95% interval. An interval that crosses zero is no relation.

-0.030+0.03
session
-0.003
week
-0.000
month
+0.000
three months
+0.004
Figure 4. Year by year

Each square is one calendar year; filled = a year in which the average stock showing the signal lagged the median stock over the next month. Years are counted, not shown in order.

ADX above 2518 of 32 years below 50
ADX below 2017 of 32 years below 50

A signal with an edge would fill most squares, or leave most empty.

Figure 5. Where it holds

Rank correlation inside each GICS sector over the next month, stocks ranked only against their own sector. Colour only where |t| ≥ 2.

Communication Services-0.004t 0.3
Real Estate-0.001t -0.1
Consumer Discretionary+0.001t 0.3
Industrials+0.002t 0.5
Financials+0.002t 0.9
Health Care+0.002t -0.2
Materials+0.003t 0.2
Information Technology+0.003t 0.1
Consumer Staples+0.006t 1.1
Energy+0.008t 1.1
Utilities+0.009t 0.4

Figure 3 treats ADX as a scale rather than a threshold. The rank correlation between a stock's ADX and its return over the next month was 0.000 (t -0.2), and it held no steady direction: its yearly average pointed one way in 16 of 32 years and the other way in the rest. At no horizon does it clear the bar for a measurable edge.

Why it doesn’t work

ADX measures how strongly a stock has been moving, not which way. A high reading covers stocks that have risen hard and stocks that have fallen hard alike, so on its own it says nothing about which stocks lead next. This study tests that reading on its own; the direction of a trend is a separate question.

4Robustness

Table 3 reads both readings horizon by horizon: over the next month, stocks with ADX above 25 sat below 50 in 18 of 32 years and above it in the rest, and stocks with ADX below 20 sat below it in 17 of 32. Table 4 finds the rank correlation near zero overall (0.000, t -0.2), in each decade and among S&P 500 members on the date (-0.008, t -0.6).

Table 3. The reading, horizon by horizon

Share that beat the median stock, its t-statistic on non-overlapping dates, and the years in which it pointed the same way.

HorizonBeat the mediantYears, same way
ADX above 25, session49.4-6.025 / 32
ADX above 25, week49.9-1.718 / 32
ADX above 25, month50.0-0.318 / 32
ADX above 25, three months50.10.215 / 32
ADX below 20, session49.9-3.115 / 32
ADX below 20, week49.9-1.719 / 32
ADX below 20, month49.9-0.517 / 32
ADX below 20, three months49.9-0.517 / 32
Table 4. Robustness of the lead relations

Rank IC and its t-statistic on non-overlapping dates.

SampleICtWednesdays
ADX (14-day), next month
All stocks, whole period0.0002-0.21,630
By decade: 1995–20040.00280.9516
By decade: 2005–2014-0.0029-0.7518
By decade: 2015–0.0007-0.2596
S&P 500 members on the date-0.0077-0.61,578
Sectors with the overall sign9 / 11

5Limitations

  • ADX measures the strength of a trend, not its direction. This study tests the strength reading on its own and does not split rising trends from falling ones (Wilder's +DI and −DI lines); a rule that pairs ADX with a direction is a different test.
  • Before costs. Averages exclude trading costs, taxes and market impact.
  • Same-close timing. Returns start at the close the signal is computed from; a real trade would start later.
  • Survivors among smaller companies. The non-index names were chosen from companies listed when the universe was built; no delisting returns are added.

6Conclusion

ADX tells how hard a stock has been moving, and on this evidence that is all it tells. Stocks in a strong trend by the textbook threshold did not go on to beat other stocks, stocks with no trend did not go on to trail them, and ranked as a scale, ADX carried no measurable relation to the following month's return. Whatever the indicator adds when paired with a direction, the strength reading alone does not separate the stocks that lead from those that lag.

References

  1. Wilder, J. W. (1978). New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems. Trend Research.
  2. Park, C.-H. and Irwin, S. H. (2007). What Do We Know About the Profitability of Technical Analysis? Journal of Economic Surveys 21(4).
  3. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57(1).
  4. Grinold, R. C. and Kahn, R. N. (2000). Active Portfolio Management, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill.
  5. Harvey, C. R., Liu, Y. and Zhu, H. (2016). … and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns. Review of Financial Studies 29(1).
  6. Shumway, T. (1997). The Delisting Bias in CRSP Data. Journal of Finance 52(1).

Appendix A. Questions readers ask

Does an ADX above 25 predict better returns?
Not across US stocks. Since 1995, stocks with a 14-day ADX above 25 beat the same day's median stock over the next month 50 times in 100 and over three months 50 times, against 50 for a coin flip. There is no measurable edge.
Is a low ADX a warning sign?
Not in the data. Stocks with ADX below 20, the textbook mark of no trend, beat the median stock over the next month 50 times in 100: indistinguishable from a coin flip, and from stocks in a strong trend.
Why doesn't ADX predict returns?
ADX measures how strongly a stock has been moving, not which way. A high reading covers stocks that have risen hard and stocks that have fallen hard alike, so on its own it says nothing about which stocks lead next. This study tests that reading on its own; the direction of a trend is a separate question.
How was ADX measured?
Every Wednesday from Jan 4, 1995 to Aug 19, 2026, the stocks whose 14-day ADX (Wilder's average directional index) sat above 25, or below 20, were compared with the same day's median stock over the next 1, 5, 21 and 63 trading sessions, on the same universe of 1,767 US stocks every study uses.

Data availability and citation

Data availability

Every figure in this paper is quoted from one frozen snapshot, published as JSON with the sample description, the robustness results and the test counts. The same snapshot feeds the research console, so the two cannot disagree.

How to cite

Opulence Alpha Research (2026). Do stocks with an ADX above 25 go on to beat the rest? Opulence Alpha Studies, Sep 25, 2026. https://opulencealpha.ai/studies/adx-strong-trend

Research, not advice. A measured tendency across hundreds of stocks is a nudge for any one of them, never a forecast of its price.